Sunday, February 20, 2011

Synyster Gates Big Hair

eyes, mate!

Last week I did something to the published conclusions of the Turkish Report flotilla set, but no glance at the legal issues that mustered this. A well-known expert on international law wrote me an e-mail with his first impressions on the conclusions of the report: The report does not seem
carefully been proofread to be, because he contradicts himself out not only himself, he also points to possible war crimes committed by the passengers, for example: 19th Israeli soldiers took off on ropes from helicopters to the Mavi Marmara. Three have been overpowered by passengers. They were taken to deeper decks, where they were doctored because of their non-fatal wounds.
21st The shooting continued, the Israeli soldiers despite pivoted by the passengers of white flags and multilingual job announcements over the speaker system on the ship.
also demonstrated extreme sloppiness # 40:

40th The ultimate "blockade" target of Israel has been the people of the Gaza Strip because of the support of Hamas to punish. This is the reason why Israel decided in 2007 a "blockade" to impose, although other options were available and these shall persevere upright, although in his supposed military targets would not give.

The naval blockade was declared in January 2009 and imposed, not 2007. As know, the Turks do not even know when did the blockade, they have absolutely no idea why this was done and have no basis for their false claim that "Israel's ultimate, Blockade' target has been the people of the Gaza Strip for its support of to punish Hamas. " In fact, from # 40 seems to indicate that the only "proof" of the Turks in support of their (false) "fact" is that Israel imposed the blockade 2007th The

rechtlichen Schlüsse des Berichts sind sowohl widersprüchlich als auch in mehreren Fällen falsch.

-> Weiterlesen hier:
http://networkedblogs.com/evjLP



0 comments:

Post a Comment