in their own right:
As Erlanger Jusochef Dr. Judge me in July in mails to various distributors accused: has " that Heinze even an anti-racist against an appeal by the DGB-looking call to the right-wing organization" applied Pax Europa "from the context of" Pro NRW " " I demanded of him a reply .
After all communication was rejected by his side, I turned on a lawyer. D araufhin Dr. Richter also has been active, could provide legal protection from the Young Socialists and submitted a proposed settlement for the amicable settlement. He was willing to retract his statements largely. It was offered on my part for the time of settlement negotiations are confidential and no further submissions and observed.
Dr. Richter did not so closely. He wrote again in mailing lists, I do advertising for a book from the far right corner. addition, he has focused internal negotiations regarding our legal efforts. Were also from the internal details of its environment passed on to various press organs, which led to extremely offensive articles:
would-linker with a missionary zeal "
http://www.nrhz.de/ flyer / beitrag.php id = 15 520
"Islamophobia infiltrates Sarrazin fifth column and the Left in Erlangen"
http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=15764
I then broke off the mediation efforts, because I doubt
on sustainable agreement will see from Dr. Richter. Now the matter is resolved legally. This in turn brings the Erlanger SPD in the soup. After looking at so far have leaned out the window, and Dr. Richter pay legal (remember, I bear the cost as a private person!), They find themselves forced to take now to influence and exert pressure on members of my party. About all sorts of private channels An attempt was made to influence members of the Left, as have the county chairman, Mr Rosner, and approached the chairman Dr. Janik with a letter to the county board of LINKE.Erlangen. They are saying that I would be "a speech by Dr. Andreas Richter also prohibit the courts."
It's amazing that I should accept such a devastating factual claims ("support of right-wing organizations") as "freedom" of Andreas Richter . As I walk sometimes, a very recent case (Schmidt-Salomon vs. Bishop Müller, http://hpd.de/node/11227 .) And to write:
Jusovorsitzende must also stick to the truth
"The court made it clear that mailing lists are not above the law. Jusovorsitzende also are committed to accuracy and truthfulness when they going on about dissenters. This is an important signal for the rule of law: Now, Dr. Richter and his colleagues, like all other citizens, are obliged to quote accurately. Perhaps they see it at some point even in yourself, it is advisable to read a call first before condemning him in their circle of chairs. "
Anyone interested in the application, the judge can Dr.Andreas offered, very moderate and desist, would have to be signed to avoid any legal dispute, has, may contact me. Dr. Richter pulled it known before, not to respond.
0 comments:
Post a Comment